This week Matt Umbro (@Matt_Umbro) came up with yet another great question set titled “Advanced PLA Tips, Tricks and Strategies.” The following is the transcribed Streamcap from the live chat:
Q1: What do you find to be the biggest challenges of dealing with the actual product feed?
- The lack of specific information for product disapprovals by Google. – Kirk Williams (@kecreate)
- Remembering to refresh the feed each month. – Logical Media Group (@LogicalMediaGr)
- Managing Product Updates in the feed. Especially when client’s do not inform you of little things like pricing changes. – James Svoboda (@Realicity)
- Descriptions. There is value to optimizing, but could still use more clarity from Google. – Jeremy Brown (@JBGuru)
- Encountered a few badly formatted feeds that are literally difficult to view/edit. – Katie Saxon (@ksaxoninternet)
- Can’t grant my MCC login user access in client’s google merchant account. – Leslie Drechsler (@ppcbuyers)
- The ability to get the feed uploaded daily, especially when you have 1000s of products. – Matt Umbro (@Matt_Umbro)
- The conversion of “client side data” into a feed that will work with Google. Not always easy. – Bryant Garvin (@BryantGarvin)
- Getting clients to keep updated feed, and to optimize their feed. – Leslie Drechsler
- Lack of information on disapprovals, mass product changes can be cumbersome, preferential treatment for bigger brands. – Jesse Semchuck (@jessesem)
- Client side resourcing/understanding of the feed and their CMS & tools. My lack of technical-ness. – Heather Cooan (@HeatherCooan)
- The dual dashboard thing. Why do we still need to log in to both GMC and GA to handle all aspects?! – Kirk Williams
- Work involved in doing proper A/B testing. – Mark Jensen (@Just_Markus)
- Having to go through the client’s tech guys to get things changed in a feed. Huge barrier and Google’s strange support processes. “Your feed has been disapproved. Fill out this form to ask us why.” – Martin Rottgerding (@bloomarty)
- Or when they suspend your feed because ONE PRODUCT is ineligible. – Matt Umbro
- For how much traffic Google is showing PLAs, they need to improve their transparency and functionality. – Jeremy Brown
- I’d say in general being able to access the feed is the biggest challenge…followed closely by AdWords support. – Matt Umbro
- Customizing thousands of SKUs with product-specific descriptions and labels. Even w/ templates, can be difficult to maintain. – Andrew Miller (@AndrewCMiller)
Q2: How do you determine your bidding structure/hierarchy in PLA campaigns?
- Lower priced products = lower bids. – Logical Media Group
- The hierarchy is very simple: No overlapping product targets except the “All Products” target with a 0.01 bid. – Martin Rottgerding
- Look at your levers: what makes a difference? Is it brand, price, etc.? Then structure accordingly. – Jeremy Brown
- Mostly the same for search, bid up the best margin/most popular/best sellers. – Neil Sorenson (@iNeils)
- Generally by analytics reports identifying what should be most profitable products. Bid on SKU level, Optimize. – Kirk Williams
- Also, granular is good, but make it managable. It can make sense to group similar product targets.- Jeremy Brown
- Unique ad group for each product id with higher bids than an All Products ad group, optimize bid based on CVR. – Leslie Drechsler
- Highest margin products are the only ones I bid up or make ad groups for. The rest get 10 cent bid. – Jesse Semchuck
- I usually worry about starting bids. Later, an automated system takes over. – Martin Rottgerding
- Segment auto targets based on margin and CR, allows me to know how much I can bid, so I can bid up on high CR high revenue items. – Amanda West-Bookwalt (@Amanda_WestBook)
- Finding value in the ad group per SKU (if you have a 3rd party tool to manage it) method. – Elizabeth Marsten (@ebkendo)
- Creating SKU level ad groups has pros and cons but generally I like the idea. – Matt Umbro
- Create other ad groups with a specific target (choose common denominator between all relevant products). – Niki Grant (@TheNikiGrant)
- Outside of major impact or exception SKUs, bid at the target level where you can speak to intent. – Data Pop (@datapop)
- How do you determine bids on precise auto targets vs. more generic?
For example, does the “red shoes” product target warrant a higher bid than the “red shoes jordan” individual product auto target?- No, the target definition might be more generic, but the traffic isn’t. – Martin Rottgerding
- True, but still value in getting the generic traffic (at a lower bid though). – Matt Umbro
- But the traffic for all red shoes combined is no more or less generic than the traffic for all red shoes individually. – Martin Rottgerding
- True, but still value in getting the generic traffic (at a lower bid though). – Matt Umbro
- Problem with “auto targets” is Google is VERY liberal with it’s “matching” like “world maps” for a kids play mat. – Bryant Garvin
- Overall, I think Google generally does a decent job matching the auto targets to correct products. Ultimately ROI is the ultimate factor and generally PLAs perform much better than regular text ads. – Matt Umbro
- ROI better because Google is choosing terms with buy intent and images/price pre-qualify. – Jeremy Brown
- No, the target definition might be more generic, but the traffic isn’t. – Martin Rottgerding
Q3: What are some custom combo auto targets that you create (ie: product_type=shoes and brand=nike)?
- No auto targets besides SKU targets. – Martin Rottgerding
- With a number of same product variations, we try to show the lowest priced (improves CTR), so adwords_labels=lowest is a winner. – James Clayton (@jamesclayts)
- Use Analytics data & client info to find good price split point. Then filter products by true/false for over/under that price. – Kirk Williams
- SKU targets are really easy to ad en masse in Google Editor. Sometimes labels or product_type can be useful. – Jeremy Brown
- Yes they are…they take some time to upload but it’s better than adding manually! – Matt Umbro
- Copying SKU numbers from Excel into Editor is quick. I’ve added thousands to a selection of ad groups in minutes. – Jeremy Brown
- Yes they are…they take some time to upload but it’s better than adding manually! – Matt Umbro
- Targeting PLAs by groupings is good, ie: adwords_grouping=Shoes and adwords_labels=Top Margin. – Matt Umbro
- Various combinations using brands, product_type, adwords_grouping and/or labels. – Nathan Kilen (@nathankilen)
- Custom combinations in PLAs are fun to use, kind of like custom combos in remarketing! – Matt Umbro
- By the way, even with SKU targets you can still name or label your adgroups in a way that lets you aggregate data by brand or type. – Martin Rottgerding
- Each auto-target can be bid differently. Why the focus on thousands of ad groups? That’s messy to me. – Jeremy Brown
- SKU adgroups allow you to write individual ad copy for each product. For example, clients often have free shipping for orders over $X. So we advertise free shipping for products over $X. SKU adgroups also help with queries. When the adgroup includes the product’s name it’s easier to make sense of queries. – Martin Rottgerding
- Would you actually create 5,000 different ad groups with 5k different lines of promo text? Seems inefficient. – Jeremy Brown
- Not manually, but yes, absolutely. – Martin Rottgerding
- We tend to use auto-targets and like ad groups for grouping similar SKUs. I don’t like my data in 5k ad groups. – Jeremy Brown
- Not manually, but yes, absolutely. – Martin Rottgerding
- Would you actually create 5,000 different ad groups with 5k different lines of promo text? Seems inefficient. – Jeremy Brown
- SKU adgroups allow you to write individual ad copy for each product. For example, clients often have free shipping for orders over $X. So we advertise free shipping for products over $X. SKU adgroups also help with queries. When the adgroup includes the product’s name it’s easier to make sense of queries. – Martin Rottgerding
- Good point. Label like products or grouped products for promotions. – Jesse Semchuck
- Each auto-target can be bid differently. Why the focus on thousands of ad groups? That’s messy to me. – Jeremy Brown
Q4: What are some advanced PLA targeting strategies that you have tried? How did they work?
- Not sure how you can go deeper now than SKU level. Brands/Price/etc. Helps group SKUs but not optimize them. – Kirk Williams
- Negative keywords for traffic sculpting. – Jeremy Brown
Q5: Do Analytics play into your feed customization? How so?
- Yes in optimizing titles and descriptions based on bounces and conv. rate. – Heather Cooan
- Engagement metrics can be useful. Especially if not buying that product. In general, AOV lower for PLAs. – Jeremy Brown
- Organic KWs or matched KW queries can be used for product feed optimization. – Jesse Semchuck
- Absolutely…use the data you have to bid up on products that show higher AOV, better return, etc. Like any online marketing service, use your Analytics! – Matt Umbro
- Yes, append UTM params in feed URLs so can view PLA traffic separately, plus product level revenue. – Leslie Drechsler
- I think this is back to needing more ways to target than just grouping & labels. Need more ways we can take action w data we see. – Kirk Williams
Q6: What are some tips for rewriting product titles and descriptions?
- Just save that time for something else. – Martin Rottgerding
- Think like an SEO in this sense (blasphemy I know
Utilize targeted KWs and keep under character limits. – Matt Umbro - Titles should include keywords you are targeting. I’ve seen Descriptions without the keywords. – Jeremy Brown
- Depends upon product but I like: (1) Important Specific KW (2) General Category KW (3) Product Name (4) Manufacturer (5) SKU. – Kirk Williams
- Anyone think Descriptions are super-important? I’m starting to view as least important element of feed. – Jeremy Brown
- They are more important for when someone views products on google dot com slash shopping. – Matt Umbro
- Descriptions are important, I’ve been able to move the needle on bounces and conv. volumes by tweaking these. – Heather Cooan
- Really? People only see the Descriptions on Google Shopping and not in the SERPs. – Jeremy Brown
- It’s the consistency between the descriptions and what’s on the actual product pages. – Heather Cooan
- Really? People only see the Descriptions on Google Shopping and not in the SERPs. – Jeremy Brown
- Never seen much use in title optimization. Shouldn’t help w/ relevancy or CTR, so why do it? – Martin Rottgerding
- Use both product type & Google’s taxonomy. So who is using the product variation attributes in their feed? – Andrew Baker (@AndrewBaker72)
- Tokenize search queries to pull out the specific attributes that matter to consumers and call those out early. – Data Pop
Resources
- Google AdWords Editor (version as of today’s PPCChat 10.1.0)
- Microsoft adCenter Desktop
- http://www.google.com/ads/answers/
- PPCChat Member List (Twitter)
- adCenter Feature Suggestion
- Bing Keyword Research Tool
- How to Create a State of the Art PLA Campaign
More PPC Chats
Don’t forget to stay tuned for the next #PPCchat on Tuesday at 12 noon Eastern, 9 am Pacific and 5pm in the UK. Same Chat time, same Chat channel.
Participants
Check out the PPC Chat Twitter list to see and connect with all current and prior participants.
Advanced Streamcaps Provided By
This is a guest post by Paul Kragthorpe; WebRanking SEM Manager in Minneapolis, Minnesota, #PPCChat Streamcap Grabber, SEO Blog Author. Connect with me @PaulKragthorpe, and Google Plus.
Follow @PaulKragthorpe

