AdWords Customer Match

This week Matt Umbro (@Matt_Umbro) came up with another great question set titled “AdWords Customer Match.” The following is the transcribed Streamcap from the live chat:

Q1: What problems/issues have you encountered while trying to implement Customer Match?

  • I’ve had some lists that have been too small. I’ve uploaded lists of 100s of people, not 1000s. – Matt Umbro
    • I have some lists uploaded this week that are sub-1k and seem to be working. Or is it a question of impact? – Kyle Crocker
      • More so impact. – Matt Umbro
  • Discovering it’s not eligible for Display Network. – Amy Hebdon (@amyppc)
    • Was disappointed by that when reading through guidelines! Wonder what their reasoning is? – Timothy Jensen (@timothyjjensen)
      • My understanding is they can only use it on properties they own (gmail, youtube, google). – Amy Hebdon
    • Wait, it’s only for Search Network? Woah, I was thinking the other way so I put it on the back burner. – Doug Thomas (@ferkungamaboobo)
  • Email list not big enough… think the minimum is 1000. – Aaron Putnam (@aaronputnam)
  • Just started using it. No major obstacles to report yet. – Kyle Crocker (@kacrocker)
  • Often Email Marketing separate from paid search team. Difference than retargeting, esp if using a DMP. Lack of trust in Google. – Lisa Sanner (@LisaSanner)
  • One client who was interested didn’t have functional opt-out link.. That’s a show-stopper. – James Hebdon (@jphebdon)

Q2: Why would advertisers use Customer Match over remarketing? Or, can both be used simultaneously? Why or why not?

  • They can both be used effectively, depeding on the way in which the email address was obtained. – Juan Restrepo (@juanrrestrepo)
  • Opportunity to target users signed up at a tradeshow (or similar), but may not have been to the site yet (or hard to segment). – Kyle Crocker
  • With Customer Match you get a deeper level of understanding of that audience than Remarketing. Use both as control levers. – James Svoboda (@Realicity)
  • Before it was in G, I used to use for Social ads. Automatic cohort groups +++, usually lower cost-pers, better exclusion lists. – Doug Thomas
  • Customer match seems like it is your BEST customers, higher affinity. Remarketing more anonymous, behavior driven. Yes, use both. – Lisa Sanner
  • Since Customer Match can link non-gmail with gmail addresses, you have the chance to hit your audience at work and home. – Gil Hong
  • Both can be used because they don’t target the same ppl: site visitors vs. your CRM, although would be nice to dedupe. Also I have targeted offers at CRM segments (did that in Facebook). – Catherine Kellogg (@CatKellogg)
  • Love that customer match works w/ search network – also marketers have a better understanding of the audience. Use both, DUH! – Margot da Cunha (@ChappyMargot)
    • I’m excited for Gmail Ads since these have super low CPCs (for now)- ability to target returning visitors will be big. – Matt Umbro
  • It’s interesting that email and paid search are now blended more than ever before. – Matt Umbro
  • I’m wonderig how long until AdWords launches a solid Email Subscriber Ad Option or Extension. – James Svoboda
    • They did at one point, but it didn’t really go anywhere. – Matt Umbro
  • According to Google, customer match is perfect for when you have customer data tied to email addresses. – Aaron Putnam
  • Having used custom audiences in social – a lot of the time the main benefit was exclusion, not “inclusion”. – Bob Bamber (@Bobbable)
  • Email, paid search & display as well, since U can target cookie pools via “customer match” w/ companies like Liveramp. – Catherine Kellogg

Q3: What are you finding to be an average Customer Match rate percentage?

  • Having uploaded exactly one email list so far, my “average” match rate is meaningless; let’s just say it wasn’t Larry Kim’s. – Amy Hebdon
  • We found it to around 50% for over 350,000 emails (slightly higher then FB’s, MUCH higher then Twitters). – Margot da Cunha

Q4: What are some Customer Match audiences you’ve created (or intend to create)? Why?

  • Customers. Tire-Kicking Leads. General Subscribers. Agency Competitors. oops, gave that secret away. – James Svoboda
  • I’d like to segment lists of current subscribers and unsubscribers then drill down to purchase behavior. – Gil Hong
  • B2C: previous shoppers for a holiday campaign; B2B: trade show attendees. – Kyle Crocker
  • Want to create LinkedIn audiences. Would like to see how effective exporting clients’ contacts would be. – Joe Martinez (@MilwaukeePPC)
  • I think upselling Customer Match users is a great value-add. Right on par with retargeting to purchasers. – Matt Umbro
  • Things I tested w/ Facebook Custom Audiences: lapsed buyers (segment with RFM), holiday buyers, non-buyers (who need incentive). – Catherine Kellogg
  • Building a Customer list via Retargeting – Pixels on the website. Helped me in converting a notable percentage of them. – Shiva Teja (@ShivaTeja1707)
  • Purchasers (so they buy again and so you can exclude if need be), segmented lists by interest (if available), etc. – Jeremy Brown (@JBGuru)

Q5: As a general question, do you believe users have become accustomed/immune to advertiser remarketing efforts? Why or why not?

  • General users: probably not. I think the benefit of being more relevant is still useful. – Kyle Crocker
  • Yes if creative is stale. No if you keep it fresh. Retailers have been dealing with this for decades with TV & Radio ads. – James Svoboda
  • I was just thinking that if this is search only, it is MUCH less in your face than retargeting banners. – Catherine Kellogg
    • Good point – and users may not even know they are being retargeted to based upon their emails. – Matt Umbro
  • Not at all. Results are still great, and your best prospects are those already familiar with you. – Jeremy Brown
  • I think if done the traditional “stalking” way – yes. But for promotions or to create demand it works just fine. – Jon Bowers (@jon_bowers)
  • No, since there’s a growing subset of savvy users that intentionally trigger for cart abandon deals. Though that’s a diff issue. – Gil Hong
  • Think there’s also something to be said for trying not to make remarketing look like remarketing – in creative & frequency. – Bob Bamber
  • People always think they’re immune to remarketing efforts – the data shows they’re not. – James Hebdon

Q6: With Customer Match, why do you believe the push has been so heavy for Search-based advertising rather than Display?

  • They typically start somewhere with options like these and then roll them out further. – James Svoboda
  • I think it will come to Display as well, no reason not to. – Catherine Kellogg
  • User intent is easier to define on search. You know the user is actively looking (discovery or ready to buy) at the time. – Joe Martinez
  • Market differentiation? FB has display on lockdown. Could be privacy issues too – G seems more cautious on that than others. – Doug Thomas
  • Growing pressure with “right to be forgotten” stuff going on in EU? that or AdWords is gearing up for their own Programmatic. – Gil Hong
  • I think Google is leary with Display early on. Let advertisers use for Search and expand to Display if goes well. – Jeremy Brown
  • RLSA has prooved to be a big boost for Search PPC for headterms that use to get ignored. This helps with that further. – James Svoboda
  • Yes, I think so. especially in B2C, people are feeling annoyed by retargeting ads -Increased Install rate of Adblock! – Shiva Teja
  • I think it might start as a bid modifier on display, hopefully graduate to targeting. – Kyle Crocker
  • Search is easier to measure and has more clearly stated intent. Less reliance on attribution and view-through. – Andrew McCarthy (@AmccartPPC)
  • Platform ownership / legal issues. This was Larry Kim’s explanation & the only one that’s made sense to me so far. – Amy Hebdon
  • And with such a potentially sensitive targeting method, going to Search first starts it small. – Matt Umbro
  • With the introduction of “Email targeting with Adwords”, people tent to build Search-based advertising email lists. – Shiva Teja
  • Adding Customer Match to Search creates differentiation vs. FB. Otherwise it’s just a “me too” change. – Mark Parent (@parentmark)

Q7: Do you believe Google will eventually add “email marketing” as a service? Or at least an add-on to AdWords? Why or why not?

  • Never say never, but unlikely in the short term. That’s a crowded space with complicated privacy issues for Google. – Jeremy Brown
  • They should. The data they could gather from scanning thise emial lists alone would make it worth the investment. – James Svoboda
  • I wouldn’t be shocked, but I don’t expect it. I think there is enough separation in advertising v. email that it won’t happen. – Kyle Crocker
  • They’re trying to move into the business email market, so may make sense. As with a lot of things, they could if they want to. – Bob Bamber
  • If they can do templates for display ads, they can do them for email. – Gil Hong

Q8: Are there clients that you WOULDN’T recommend Customer Match for? Why?

  • Yes, clients of competiting agencies. – James Svoboda
  • If this was a display product, I wouldn’t advise on sensitive verticals. On that topic, any pharm/medical restrictions. – Gil Hong
  • Clients that are prohibited (i.e. – certain health products). Also, clients only interested in email signups. – Matt Umbro
  • Clients with a purchased low quality list. – Jonathan Ng (@ThankYouJon)

PPCChat Sponsored by

CallRail is a call tracking platform that brings enterprise-level call analytics to businesses and agencies. CallRail makes it easy to track which marketing sources and keywords make your phone ring. We provide call tracking, recording, and analytics for PPC, SEO, web, and offline marketing campaigns. With CallRail, you can create tracking phone numbers instantly, get reports in real time, and increase your advertising ROI by learning which campaigns and keywords deliver valuable phone leads.

CallRail

Resources

More PPCChats

Don’t forget to stay tuned for the next #PPCchat on Tuesday at 12 noon Eastern, 9 am Pacific and 5pm in the UK. Same Chat time, same Chat channel.

Participants

Check out the PPCChat Twitter list to see and connect with all current and prior participants.

• Matt Umbro (@Matt_Umbro)
• James Svoboda (@Realicity)
• Paul Kragthorpe (@PaulKragthorpe)
 
• Aaron Putnam (@aaronputnam)
• Amy Hebdon (@amyppc)
• Andrew McCarthy (@AmccartPPC)
• Bob Bamber (@Bobbable)
• Catherine Kellogg (@CatKellogg)
• Doug Thomas (@ferkungamaboobo)
• James Hebdon (@jphebdon)
• Jeremy Brown (@JBGuru)
• Joe Martinez (@MilwaukeePPC)
• Jon Bowers (@jon_bowers)
• Jonathan Ng (@ThankYouJon)
• Juan Restrepo (@juanrrestrepo)
• Kyle Crocker (@kacrocker)
• Kyle Crocker (@kacrocker)
• Lisa Sanner (@LisaSanner)
• Margot da Cunha (@ChappyMargot)
• Mark Parent (@parentmark)
• Shiva Teja (@ShivaTeja1707)
• Timothy Jensen (@timothyjjensen)

Customer Match Streamcap by

This is a guest post by Paul Kragthorpe; works at WebRanking in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Connect with Paul @PaulKragthorpe, and Google Plus.

Be Sociable, Share!

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored By

Recent Tweets



I am speaking at SMX East
PPCChat.co was rated one of the Best PPC Blogs by Boost CTR