All About Ad Extensions

This week Matt Umbro (@Matt_Umbro) came up with yet another great question set titled “All About Ad Extensions.” The following is the transcribed Streamcap from the live chat:

Q1: What is your take on the relevance/importance of ad extensions in today’s PPC landscape? Why?

  • Essential not only for SERP real estate but also for ad rank. Include extensions or get buried. – Chris Haleua (@chrishaleua)
  • The more real estate, the better. TAKE ALL THE AD SPACE. – Brooke Townsend (@btownsend13)
  • Important to increase shelf space. Also helps with relevance to direct people to exactly what they need from the ad. – Kimberly Wingo (@wimmiekingo)
  • Hugely important to take up real estate on the SERPS with multiple ad extensions. – Mark Roll (@MarkRoll32)
  • In B2B, extensions offer a chance to show user the breadth of our expertise. – Matt Lukens (@tunadonut)
  • I’ve always seen ad extensions as necessary for taking up more space and improving headline CTR (sorry, interaction rate!) – Matt Umbro
  • Always seems like a good idea for maximizing space, but never actually verified that with data. – Kyle Crocker (@kacrocker)
  • In today’s landscape, you cant discount the impact that the extra size of the ad when extensions are included provide. – Evan Cummins (@cummins_evan)
  • A necessity. Ad extensions have a direct affect on your Ad Rank. – Joe Martinez (@MilwaukeePPC)
  • Ad Extensions are brilliant for adding context to a users query as well as personalisation. On campaign setup checklist! – Jason James (@Jason_A_James)
  • Beyond the more space point, they are inarguably important now that Google admitted they impact ranking. – Nate Knox (@nateknox)
  • It adds a lot to your ad. It could be a winning factor between your ad and another getting the click. – Amy Valleskey (@amy_valleskey)
  • Definitely more important from an ad rank/real estate factor rather than a creative standpoint. – Gil Hong (@Gil__Hong)
  • Extensions are an integral part of any ppc strategy. More space on page, more validation points for the brand, etc. – Michael Knight (@MichaelAKnight)
  • Only blocker is that you need to be in the top 3 .. not good when competition is very high (real estate). – Sameer Hakim (@hakim_sameer)
  • low relevance/low importance. They’re just not big levers. – Steve Gibson (@stevegibsonppc)
  • But when all the ads have multiple extensions, could you benefit by not having any & thus stand out? – Robert Brady (@robert_brady)
  • It’s a million places to add more USPs. Relevant uniqueness is the #1 factor for CTR. – Doug Thomas (@ferkungamaboobo)
  • I’ve never heard of an argument not to use ad extensions. They’re so fast and easy too. – Mark Irvine (@MarkIrvine89)
  • Bid + expected CTR + LP quality + ad relevancy + ad Extensions = Ad rank. Recent test for Adobe Extended headlines + Site Links + Callout Extensions = 13% CTR lift. – Chris Haleua
  • Ad extensions give the consumer more “touch points” with your site before clicking in and make the content more relatable. – Alexandria Lowe (@alexlowe2015)

Q2: How often do you update your sitelink and callout extensions? Why?

  • Way less often than I should. Tend to fall into “set and forget” unless I make a point to review. – Kyle Crocker
  • Depends on the size of the client and seasonality. Always update for new products/promos and offers. – Mark Roll
  • The biggest driver for updating is usually for promo/update/new release purposes. Other than that, the data can be lacking. – Gil Hong
  • Very rarely TBH – as long as they are relevant I’m OK since most clicks occur on the ad headline. – Matt Umbro
  • Probably not enough. But in general USPs don’t change, helpful & converting content slow to be produced. So what’s the goal? – Doug Thomas
  • Update Sitelink extensions only when site structure or content changes. Callout extensions if/when USP’s or value-add changes. – Jason James
  • I’ve never quite understood scheduling sitelinks – do sitelinks really need to get this granular? And I understand the purpose of scheduling them, but again, does it really make that much of an impact? – Matt Umbro
  • Sitelinks/callouts can help your account by being updated to direct people to a big sale or offer. Otherwise, top site pages. – Evan Cummins
  • Not as often as I should – but at the very least, when brand messaging changes, pages update, etc. Quarterly is usually works well. – Michael Knight
  • For ecommerce you need to make sure site links surface your current promos/seasonal product changes, so as often as needed. – Catherine Kellogg (@CatKellogg)
  • I’m usually updating sitelinks when new products arrive, but callout extensions I keep somewhat general, so not as often. – Amy Valleskey
  • Weekly .. provided there are new offers to show .. which there are .. also based on demand and supply. – Sameer Hakim
  • Probably quarterly, to ensure that ext. linked pages don’t correlate with lower overall conversion rates. – Matt Lukens
  • I try to review monthly or quarterly, unless there are promotions in them. – Brooke Townsend
  • If my main selling points or value messages don’t change, then my callouts don’t change a lot. Just test. I’m not ecom though. – Joe Martinez
  • Rarely. You have fewer characters to A/B test and fewer impressions are impacted by any changes. – Mark Parent (@parentmark)
  • Rarely. I test adcopy regularly but haven’t found a need to test extensions/callouts as much. – Coy Robison (@IamCoy)
  • Honest answer: not often unless I have a deal to push or something’s clearly not working, gains of varying sitelinks is minor. – Mark Irvine
  • If there isn’t a big sale or offer that i’m trying to push, I dont usually change the sitelinks or callouts. – Evan Cummins
  • Sitelink testing & timing = super important for ecommerce. Otherwise, not that important elsewhere to need constant adjustment. – Sam Owen (@SamOwenPPC)
  • Another thought: we at least check callouts when new ad copy is launched so there isn’t any redundancy. – Gil Hong
  • I spend more time just making sure I have coverage across all extension types and search engines than going back & changing them. – Chris Haleua
  • I update my sitelink & callout extensions fairly frequently. We have a lot of events and changing components, so it’s necessary. – Hannah Johnson (@MarketingHannah)

Q3: What is your philosophy on creating ad group level sitelink and callout extensions? Why?

  • 1st- Depends on Volume. 2nd- Depends on history & data analysis. 3rd- Depends on uniqueness of ad group vs others in campaign. – James Svoboda (@Realicity)
  • Generally only ad group level sitelinks on top impression ad groups. – Matt Umbro
  • For ecomm (esp. apparel) they’re very important! Help direct users to Mens/Womens/Styles in as few clicks as possible. – Gil Hong
  • Generally if the client has products lines that are different enough to need separate extensions it is a separate campaign. – Kyle Crocker
  • If it compliments your site structure and value messages change by level go for it, but don’t make it #1 priority. – Joe Martinez
  • I tend to defer to campaign level, simply because that can be a lot of maintenance (depending on your set up) to take care of. – Elizabeth Marsten (@ebkendo)
  • If the account is big enough I create ad group level sitelinks, usually related products. – Mark Roll
  • Large accounts = no time for that. Too granular for the maintenance. – Brooke Townsend
  • Create unique ad group level extensions for the top 20% of Ad Groups based on performance. Try to give them a CTR advantage. – Hannah Alexander (@HanXela)
  • If there’s logic to it, and enough traffic volume that cost/benefit justifies the time. – Steve Gibson
  • If the offer doesn’t speak to an ad group/ campaign – then make more granular extensions.Otherwise, let it ride across acct. – Mark Irvine
  • I don’t typically create sitelinks/callouts at that level. Unless the account is very diverse & would benefit from separation. – Evan Cummins
  • Depends on your architecture & how granular campaigns are. Kind of a headache. If you have a lot of AG SLs, time to restructure. – Lisa Sanner (@LisaSanner)
  • Only if it is large enough and unique enough to benefit from specialized messaging, which is rare (except for ecomm). – Mark Parent
  • Depends…If the ad group is granular enough to warrant a more defined sitelink/callout then I’ll add ad group level Sitelinks. – Kimberly Wingo
  • If the adgroup is pretty product specific, I’m adding those adgroup level extensions. Try to stay extremely relevant. – Amy Valleskey
  • Our product set is small enough, campaign level does fine. A few adgroup level test in top impression campaigns though. – Coy Robison
  • Usually not, but if I feel like the ad group could benefit, then I will. Otherwise it’s time consuming for every ad group. – Hannah Johnson

Q4: Do you find that any of the automated extensions (Seller Ratings, etc) make a noticeable difference in click activity? Why?

  • I don’t have the A/B test data for them, but the ad rank and real estate boost is too compelling. – Gil Hong
  • I’ve seen increases in CTR and lower CPA, more real estate and more trust. – Mark Roll
  • Social Is often a bust if the numbers are low. The opposite of confidence inspiring. – Steve Hammer (@armondhammer)
  • This is an area I need to explore more for sure. – Kyle Crocker
  • The only ones that I care about are consumer ratings, seller ratings, and social extensions – everything else is blah. Any extensions that shows customer feedback (assuming it’s good) is worthwile. – Matt Umbro
  • Like all other extensions, I see the Automated ones as Googs way of telling searchers they should just click top/expensive ads. – James Svoboda
  • Seller ratings definitely do. And the star rating is pretty important in the % lift. Think 15% for 5 star. – Sam Owen
  • No A/B testing here, but it’s hard to imagine the added real estate doesn’t help. – Mark Parent
  • More so with non-brand queries but it kind of depends. – Coy Robison
  • Nothing huge for performance, slightly higher conv rate when seller ratings show for one client. – Jordon Meyer (@jordonmeyer)
  • Yes! Especially when Amazon also sells your products. Because their search ads have all the automated extensions. – Joe Martinez
  • I’ve been disappointed when clients have added seller ratings (by getting reviews) and the ctr barely moved. – Steve Gibson

Q5: Do you use call extensions and if so, do you find the call data to be accurate? Why or why not?

  • I use call extensions, but for the real estate. I have no expectations of quality calls. – Matt Umbro
  • Yes, but no, the data is not always accurate. Only a sample size comes through and only is tracked through high volume campaigns. Spoke to a Goog rep once bc we had call tracking through a 3rd party # that was tracking more calls. – Kimberly Wingo
  • ALL DAY ERRY DAY. Buckets of ducats. For reporting, filter for over 20sec to count. Have tested to CallRail number to verify. – Doug Thomas
  • I use call extensions whenever relevant. Have combined w/ CallRail numbers to record calls…data seems accurate. – Timothy Jensen (@timothyjjensen)
  • Yes and… yes? We’re close with one client who shares call data with us, it looks pretty accurate. Helps show value of PPC. – Jordon Meyer
  • Yes use Call Extensions. I use 3rd party call data for accuracy of data. – Kurt Henninger (@KurtHenninger)
  • I use call extensions and find that for certain industries like law, it works well. I try and confirm performance with clients. – Evan Cummins
  • Yes, and I’m skeptical at to how they track this data. Also, Call Volume has declines since the “Call Only” option in Call Extensions was removed in June with Call-Only Campaigns launch. – James Svoboda
  • No. We have a call-center for customer service but phone calls are not a conversion for us. – Coy Robison
  • For lead gen in certain industries SERP calls = current customers. Website call extensions have more potential for better quality. – Nicole Mintiens (@Tregesy)
    • True. We don’t use call tracking for campaigns (branded) where customers are likely the ones to call. Or different Phone. – James Svoboda
  • Not anymore. 95%+ of calls totally irrelevant to business goals, for all businesses I’ve tested call ext. – Matt Vaillancourt (@SEM_PPC_MattV)
  • We use call extensions a lot but I hate call only campaigns. – Melissa Mackey (@Mel66)
  • Mobile call extensions have an impressively high CVR – over 20%.Call length equal to that of desk calls. – Mark Irvine
  • Call data is hard to know for sure – that’s why I always implement the call conversion for longer phone calls for the intent. – Michael Knight
  • It makes sense for me to use it. Still have to do tons of slicing and dicing of data to analyze good quality calls. – Amy Valleskey
  • Call only campaign success depends on business type and goals. If sales cycle is long SERP calls prob not super relevant. – Nicole Mintiens
    • Agreed. Call-only is great for service businesses (like HVAC, plumbing, bail bond, etc.) – Robert Brady

Q6: For those who use app extensions, do you find that users will actually interact with your app (ad click or download)?

  • We use app extension on search with deep linked urls .. better experience .. higher engagement. – Sameer Hakim
  • Have to use app extensions carefully, especially for ecomm – sometimes the app doesn’t allow for purchases. In other words, the app is an add on to the ecomm site – don’t necessarily want to take users away from purchasing. – Matt Umbro
  • Yes, certain small businesses. I’ve learned to target by radius as it’s more difficult to target by zip code. – Chris Scott
  • Unfortunately no, app reengagment rates are fearfully small universally, particularly for SMBs. – Mark Irvine
  • Target CPA bidding with a Free app, using the App Install ad format. Works like a charm at a good CPA in our experience. – Jordon Meyer
  • Else we only make use of app download search cmp or normal search with non app sitelinks .. keep it clean. – Sameer Hakim
  • I’ve had some interaction with app extensions, but not a ton. Hard to know how qualified they are (for B2B). – Michael Knight

PPCChat Sponsored by

CallRail is a call tracking platform that brings enterprise-level call analytics to businesses and agencies. CallRail makes it easy to track which marketing sources and keywords make your phone ring. We provide call tracking, recording, and analytics for PPC, SEO, web, and offline marketing campaigns. With CallRail, you can create tracking phone numbers instantly, get reports in real time, and increase your advertising ROI by learning which campaigns and keywords deliver valuable phone leads.

CallRail

Resources

More PPCChats

Don’t forget to stay tuned for the next #PPCchat on Tuesday at 12 noon Eastern, 9 am Pacific and 5pm in the UK. Same Chat time, same Chat channel.

Participants

Check out the PPCChat Twitter list to see and connect with all current and prior participants.

• Matt Umbro (@Matt_Umbro)
• James Svoboda (@Realicity)
• Paul Kragthorpe (@PaulKragthorpe)
• Alexandria Lowe (@alexlowe2015)
• Amy Valleskey (@amy_valleskey)
• Brooke Townsend (@btownsend13)
• Catherine Kellogg (@CatKellogg)
• Chris Haleua (@chrishaleua)
• Coy Robison (@IamCoy)
• Doug Thomas (@ferkungamaboobo)
• Elizabeth Marsten (@ebkendo)
• Evan Cummins (@cummins_evan)
• Gil Hong (@Gil__Hong)
• Hannah Alexander (@HanXela)
• Hannah Johnson (@MarketingHannah)
• Jason James (@Jason_A_James)
• Joe Martinez (@MilwaukeePPC)
• Jordon Meyer (@jordonmeyer)
• Kimberly Wingo (@wimmiekingo)
• Kurt Henninger (@KurtHenninger)
• Kyle Crocker (@kacrocker)
• Lisa Sanner (@LisaSanner)
• Mark Irvine (@MarkIrvine89)
• Mark Parent (@parentmark)
• Mark Roll (@MarkRoll32)
• Matt Lukens (@tunadonut)
• Matt Vaillancourt (@SEM_PPC_MattV)
• Melissa Mackey (@Mel66)
• Michael Knight (@MichaelAKnight)
• Nate Knox (@nateknox)
• Nicole Mintiens (@Tregesy)
• Robert Brady (@robert_brady)
• Sam Owen (@SamOwenPPC)
• Sameer Hakim (@hakim_sameer)
• Steve Gibson (@stevegibsonppc)
• Steve Hammer (@armondhammer)
• Timothy Jensen (@timothyjjensen)
 

All About the Streamcapper

This is a guest post by Paul Kragthorpe; works at WebRanking in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Connect with Paul @PaulKragthorpe, and Google Plus.

Be Sociable, Share!

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored By

Recent Tweets



I am speaking at SMX East
PPCChat.co was rated one of the Best PPC Blogs by Boost CTR